Work mapped to active objectives
What share of delivered ETV lands on the company's prioritized objectives — and what's leaking out into unaligned or maintenance work.
Alignment is the single biggest constraint on transformation
Only 51% of delivered work currently maps to one of the six active company objectives. The remaining 49% is either unaligned (31%) or pure maintenance (18%) — capacity that should be redeployed if the H2 roadmap is going to land. Alignment has fallen 11 pointsover 12 months while AI share rose, meaning we're getting more done — just not on the right things.
Capacity allocation
All 100 points of org capacity broken into where ETV is currently landing.
What to act on
Where the alignment gap is biggest — ranked by lever size.
No active objective claims this work. Closing this gap alone could push alignment from 51% to ~70%. Either retire dead initiatives or open formal objectives for them.
From 13% to 18% in 12 months. Most of the lift is on-call and post-incident work in Revenue Systems and Data Infrastructure — both also trail on AI share.
Largest single capacity sink at 33% and the only objective that’s both well-staffed and high AI-share (48%). Treat it as the working blueprint for the rest.
10% capacity for a parity push that’s supposed to unblock Q3 retention — small budget, large dependency surface. Either upgrade staffing or descope.
Alignment over time
Share of weekly ETV mapped to active objectives, 12-month trend.
By objective
How current capacity is distributed across the six active objectives.